Chatoyance was evaluated in some samples where bark could be evaluated.
In the first sample (Acacia Dealbata), it would seem that bark has very high P values which, due to its dark colour, turn into relatively low PZC values:
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08396gif.gif)
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08396_point_1-detail.png)
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08396_point_1-detail-PZC.png)
One more “lucky” acacia sample provided a view on a flat bark area which could be sanded and analyzed as if it were solid wood:
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08404gif-crop.gif)
The P chart still shows the 2-peaked behaviour that is typical for wood:
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08404-brightness-vs-theta.png)
One more example could be obtained on Eucalyptus Globulus:
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08408gif.gif)
In this case chatoyance seems to be lower in the bark layer, but still there:
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08408_point_2-detail-PZC.png)
This Acacia Melanoxylon sample provides the same result: a two-peaked chart on a tangential bark surface:
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08432gif.gif)
![](https://www.chatometry.com/wp-content/uploads/test_08432-brightness-vs-theta.png)